Effect of slice thickness on the accuracy of linear measurements made on cone beam computed tomography images (In Vitro)

  • Mahkameh Moshfeghi Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Mohammad Amin Tavakoli Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Dara Ghaznavi General Dentist, Private Practice, Tehran, Iran.
  • Aisan Ghaznavi Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
Keywords: accuracy, cone-beam computed tomography, dental implants, dimensional measurement

Abstract

Objective Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is applied for the imaging of the maxillofacial and dental structures, particularly for surgical
treatments and dental implants. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of slice thickness on the accuracy of CBCT linear measurements.
Methods In this diagnostic accuracy study, forty-two titanium pins with the same dimensions were inserted into seven dry sheep mandibles.
The length of the pins before the insertion was carefully measured by a digital caliper, (0.01 mm accuracy). Imaging of the mandible
performed using CBCT New Tom VGi. After image reconstruction by NNT Viewer, linear measurements were made on cross-sectional slices
(thicknesses of 0.125, 0.5, 1 and 2 mm) by three radiologists. The accuracy of measurements assessed using descriptive indices and
compared between different slice thicknesses by repeated measures ANOVA.
Results Repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant difference between different slice thicknesses (P = 0.024). According to the least
significant difference (LSD) test, the difference in absolute errors was significant in all thicknesses (P = 0.024). Measurements at 0.125 mm
thickness were significantly different from others, with a higher error rate (mean absolute error = 0.17). Measurements at 0.5 mm thickness
showed a significant difference with those at 0.125 and 2 mm (mean absolute error = 0.15). Measurements at 2 mm thickness were
significantly different from those at 0.125 mm thickness (mean absolute error = 0.13).The average error rate was lower in 2 mm
thickness and the measurements were more accurate.
Conclusion A statistically significant difference was seam between CBCT measurements and actual sizes in different slice thicknesses. The
differences were below 1 mm, and clinically acceptable.

Published
2016-06-06
Section
Articles